In 2010 Deposition, Cardinal Mahony Explains Why He Didn’t Call Police During Child Sex Abuse Scandal
April 3, 2021
Roger Mahony and Archbishop Jose Gomez Sued For Gender Violence and Protecting Pedophile Priests
May 29, 2021
- Jan. 21, 2013
Reprint with permission from the NY Times. Article originally published January 21, 2013.
Roger Mahony’s criminal behavior is not new. Why is he not in jail?
LOS ANGELES — The retired archbishop of Los Angeles, Cardinal Roger M. Mahony, and other high-ranking clergymen in the archdiocese worked quietly to keep evidence of child molesting away from law enforcement officials and shield abusive priests from criminal prosecution more than a decade before the scandal became public, according to confidential church records.
The documents, filed in court as part of lawsuit against the archdiocese and posted online by The Los Angeles Times on Monday, offer the clearest glimpse yet of how the archdiocese dealt with abusive priests in the decades before the scandal broke, including Cardinal Mahony’s personal involvement in covering up their crimes.
Rather than defrocking priests and contacting the police, the archdiocese sent priests who had molested children to out-of-state treatment facilities, in large part because therapists in California were legally obligated to report any evidence of child abuse to the police, the files make clear.
In 1986, Cardinal Mahony wrote to a New Mexico treatment center where one abusive priest, Msgr. Peter Garcia, had been sent.
ADVERTISEMENTContinue reading the main story
“I believe that if Monsignor Garcia were to reappear here within the archdiocese we might very well have some type of legal action filed in both the criminal and civil sectors,” Cardinal Mahony wrote.
1 Comment
Roger lives quite the life..he’s a modernist, probable heretic…inept leader, spiritually bankrupt and is being sued for sexual assault of a minor male…yet somehow, incomprehensibly, he wears a Roman collar, a red beret, and a pectoral cross, with full faculties as a priest in good standing and still oversees the archdiocese…can anyone explain this to me?